In a desperate last minute rush, I took my 86,000 mile 106 Diesel along to Warwick Wright City in London for a basic service and MOT. I later got a call saying that the timing belt was showing wear and should be replaced. The guy added the horror scenario of the belt being in danger of breaking during the emissions test when the accelerator was floored. Now I took this to be a typical sales pitch ploy, but with the car having that mileage I thought it not unreasonable that the timing belt would need replacing, and although £400 was a whopping sum I knew I was paying for exrotionate hourly rates and from what I've heard 3 hours+ for the work was not completely excessive. So, wishing to just get the work out of the way I reluctantly agreed. The problem was I hadn't taken the time to read through the service book before handing the car over, and so I only spotted afterwards that the timing belt is listed as having been replaced (while owned by the previous owner) at 78,000 miles less than 18 months earlier! A timing belt wearing out in 8,000 miles without obvious mechanical problems elsewhere? Have I just been conned out of my cash? Would a mechanic spot the level of cam belt wear during a barebones service? And if it is as I fear, what recourse have I got now? Charlie